Vivre wrote:Well, what an effort to disprove the literal meaning of a myth of origin.
Still I enjoyed reading it and like to leave some remarks.
Hi Vivre!
You're right, this isn't the greatest challenge, but it's a challenge nonetheless, set by a man with a PHD don't you now

- The face of the deep might have been in the dark in case there'd been an eclipse of the sun.
Sorry, I'm a tad tired, could you say this bit again? I'm not quite sure what you're getting at.
- as for your rather scientific quotations I would have liked to know what letter there is beween Pb ? Pb, but also the source doesn't display it to me.
Another letter is missing in: ( ? 18O). Here the original loads a picture for its diplay: >
< http://www.nature.com/__chars/delta/bla ... /glyph.gif
Cheers for that. I will try and find the original paper and add the parts which have been replaced. Also, in future posts I shall try and find a paper with all the notation present and correct.
- Just in case: I missed the source reference of the used bible text.
Just saying - 'cos if I'd translated my version to english it would come up differently. There's neither face nor deep in it and the earth was desert and confused 
Ha, oops, I got so carried away with typing, I forgot to reference the bloody Bible I used. Yep, noted, that shall also be included in the next'un.
I wonder what you'll say when the light gets switched on ~ greets
"AHHH, NOT YET, I HAVEN'T PUT MY PANTS ON"
Or something similar.