Bernhard.visscher wrote:The charts must be CURRENT and ACCEPTED by the evolutionary community.

As well the definitions.

If you weren't such a disingenuous person I would've happily debated you. But you've proven over the last couple of days that you don't know what the hell you are talking about and you refuse to see that. I mean your signature alone, not every atheist is agnostic and yet you refuse to change your mind, you're proud of your own ignorance. You are not worthy of a debate, I'm sorry!

"The problem with the world is that the intelligent people are full of doubts while the stupid ones are full of confidence", I haven't seen this quote more applicable on this forum than it is now. It's amazing how arrogant you are while everybody here sees how ignorant you actually are. Dunning-Kruger....look it up!

Evolution is real, deal with it. Grow the fuck up.

More nonsense from Bernhard. The evidence for evolution is not irrefutable. Nothing in science is.

The evidence is merely extremely robust and no one refuted it as of yet.

You already participate in a thread specifically discussing evo theory. Secondly, sticking this in the pseudoscience forum, knowing full well it is an antagonistic move, is childish. This is the second time you've created a superfluous thread, when you could raise these points in the one that already exists. I suggest you don't try for a third.

Locked.