Elsewhere on the internet...

The League of Reason has some social media accounts! You can find us on Facebook or on Twitter for some interesting links and things.

Roger Ebert on movie ratings

Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
 [ 2 posts ] 
Roger Ebert on movie ratings
Author Message
GrimlockUser avatarPosts: 205Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 5:49 pm

Post Roger Ebert on movie ratings

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... 36296.html

Great now we just need the MPAA or who ever is making the rating to adopt this system and we can finally be rid of all the BS about a movie getting a pg-13 rating because a woman might flash her breasts for a brief second or two.
Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:28 am
lrkunUser avatarPosts: 3831Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 8:37 pmLocation: R. Gender: Tree

Post Re: Roger Ebert on movie ratings

Grimlock wrote:http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703766704576009343432436296.html

Great now we just need the MPAA or who ever is making the rating to adopt this system and we can finally be rid of all the BS about a movie getting a pg-13 rating because a woman might flash her breasts for a brief second or two.


According to the article:
Perhaps only three categories are needed: "G," for young audiences, "T" for teenagers, and "A" for adults. These categories would be not be keyed to specific content but would reflect the board's considered advice about a film's gestalt and intended audience. At a time when literally any content can find its way into most American homes, what's the point of singling out theatrical films? It's time to admit we've lost our innocence.


Don't you think it'd be difficult to classify movies into these three alone? Still, appreciate the article. :D
Unsupport unthink.
Wed Dec 15, 2010 8:21 pm
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
 [ 2 posts ] 
Return to TV, Film & Documentaries

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests
cron