Author  Message 

Re: A math Problemhe_who_is_nobody wrote:[quoteX/(real numbers)(one's time)(one's memory)(y)(z).... the problem is that you are not suppose to multiply all that stuff the actual ecuación would be X / the smallest of all these stuff (real numbers)(one's time)(one's memory)(y)(z) so for example Time = enough time to write a number with 1,000 digits or less Memory = enough memory to type a number with 10,000 digits or less Y = enough Y to type a number with 100,000 digits or less Z = enough Y to type a number with 1,000,000 digits or less Given that time is the smallest of all, equation would be x/ 1,000 so in other words, it doesn't matter if you have enough memory to type 10,000 digits or infinite XYZ, given that you only have time to type 1,000 digits, 1,000 is your limit. UNDERSTAND? "events with a zero probability happen all the time"


Fri May 19, 2017 7:08 pm 

Re: A math Problemleroy wrote:Grumpy Santa wrote:You're being aggravatingly dishonest Leroy. You ignored these: No. I just typed this: א_{0} Which is the smallest countably infinite cardinal number. You lose. Again. Go on, keep wriggling. 

Fri May 19, 2017 8:45 pm 

Re: A math Problemleroy wrote:many things stop me, time would be an example, even with exponents logarithms decimals or whatever, there is still a limited amount of numbers that can be typed. Just admit that you don't know any more about mathematics than you do about anything else. You're demonstrably wrong here, and the fact that you think quoting me in your signature as some sort of gotcha is extremely telling. That statement is a demonstrable fact, despite the fact that you haven't the wherewithal to grasp it. Last edited by hackenslash on Sat May 20, 2017 8:27 am, edited 1 time in total.


Fri May 19, 2017 8:48 pm 

Re: A math Problem
Greetings,
I think you got who said what confused, hack. Kindest regards, James "The Word of God is the Creation we behold and it is in this Word, which no human invention can counterfeit or alter, that God speaketh universally to man." The Age Of Reason 

Sat May 20, 2017 1:21 am 

Re: A math ProblemDragan Glas wrote:Greetings, Oops, sorry James. It seems I was less than entirely diligent in my trimming of the quotes. Fixeded. 

Sat May 20, 2017 8:28 am 

Re: A math Problem
Greetings,
hackenslash wrote:Dragan Glas wrote:Greetings, Thanks, Hack, no problem. Kindest regards, James "The Word of God is the Creation we behold and it is in this Word, which no human invention can counterfeit or alter, that God speaketh universally to man." The Age Of Reason 

Sat May 20, 2017 12:51 pm 

Re: A math Problemhackenslash wrote:leroy wrote:many things stop me, time would be an example, even with exponents logarithms decimals or whatever, there is still a limited amount of numbers that can be typed. Wrong, every time something (human, computer, robot etc.) selects a number randomly, it always selects from a finite pool of options, because there is always something that limits the options to a finite number of options. .........I provided indisputable evidence for this and you haven't presented any evidence for the contrary No. I just typed this: this is the kind of semantic neat picking that moderators should try to prevent. it is still a fact that the set of numbers that can be typed in a computer is finite. and I already proved it. "events with a zero probability happen all the time"


Sun May 21, 2017 2:45 pm 

Re: A math Problem
You proved nothing other than that you haven't the first fucking clue of what you're talking about.
And can the backseat moderation. They know what they're doing. 

Sun May 21, 2017 6:33 pm 

he_who_is_nobodyPosts: 3347Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 1:36 amLocation: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Gender: Male

Re: A math Problemleroy wrote:he_who_is_nobody wrote:[quoteX/(real numbers)(one's time)(one's memory)(y)(z).... Beyond the fact that I do not know how one would determine which was the smallest, why would we only devide by the smallest variable? As I keep pointing out, we are determining the odds. I have never heard of just deviding by the smallest variable to determine the odds. Care to justify your reasoning? (_''_) (_.._) 
Mon May 22, 2017 4:45 pm 

Re: A math Problemhe_who_is_nobody wrote:[ you don't have to determine which is the smallest, as long as you gran that at least 1 variable limits your options to a finite set of options, you would prove that the odds are grater than 1 / Infinity he_who_is_nobody wrote: how many McDonald's hamburgers can you eat ? what is the maximum number of hamburgers that you can eat? in order to solve this problem you will consider all the variables that limit your options 1 the amount of hamburgers that your stomach can tolerate 2 the amount of hamburgers available in the restorant 3 the amount of hamburgers that you can pay for 4 The amount of time that you have available 5 Y 6 Z the answer would be the smallest of all these numbers, .........agree? it would be wrong to multiply these variables...............agree? as long as there is 1 variable that limits your options to a finite number, the answer would be less than infinite hamburgers .............agree? even if 2 where infinite, the answer would still be a finite number of hamburgers..............agree? "events with a zero probability happen all the time"


Mon May 22, 2017 5:11 pm 

he_who_is_nobodyPosts: 3347Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 1:36 amLocation: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Gender: Male

Re: A math Problem
Dandan/Leroy, again we are talking about the odds, not specific cases. Beyond that, you changed the situation to something that would have limits (hamburgers) from something that you admitted is infinate (the real numbers). It is almost as if you know you are wrong. In addition, your "example" demonstrates that you do not know the first thing about calculating the odds. All the variables have to be accounted for to determine the odds. There is nothing that allows one to throwout variables without first justifying that action. However, I did make a mistake with my equation. The variables need to be added, not multiplied.
(_''_) (_.._) 
Tue May 23, 2017 4:20 pm 
