I dunno, the way you describe watching it in a security office makes it sound as though you had nothing better to watch.

Anyway, I tend to disagree that it’s aged well. Spock is, in my opinion, one of the few redeeming qualities the show has at the point I’m at.
I think my perception might be skewed by the first season, however. Every Trek series has a bad first season, even TNG and DS9. I heard that TOS was the exception, but having seen it for myself, I really don’t agree with that assessment. I know they really didn’t have things down yet; we don’t even know about the United Federation of Planets until near the end of that first season, and for some reason Spock kept getting called a “Vulcanian”. These issues are not what I’m talking about when I’m complaining about the first season. It’s Kirk’s apparent disregard for other civilizations he visits when he forces his values on them,
especially when it was none of his business. Bones even encouraged it one time (“The Apple”, a Season 2 episode) and it really annoyed me. I mean, granted, when the crew on the planet started influencing the local culture in a way Vaal didn’t seem to like, he decided to try having them killed rather than simply evicting them, but that’s beside the point. Spock was the sole voice of reason in that episode.
I realize these episodes may be few and far in between, but I cannot simply ignore the problem just because it came from the late 60’s.

And I’m only in the early part of Season 2 now. Maybe they’ll get better about this, and things will start to look like the Star Trek I know and love.
The very thing that gives us humans our advanced cognitive abilities can also be our greatest weakness.